I personally don't think he's made a good film since Jackie Brown and couldn't even finish watching Inglorious Basterds but some of you might be
interested in this
So: Gary, the Mona Lisa. This is trash.
TRASH. How many tigers or skulls are in this painting?
THE ANSWER IS ZERO, WHICH IS THE garyEST NUMBER OF SKULLS OR TIGERS YOU CAN HAVE IN A PAINTING.
it amazes me that QT is still allowed to make films and that people discuss them amongst each other and so on, that lifetime pass for Pulp Fiction is
wearing a bit thin.
That looks crap. QT has become all about style over substance.
I was a MASSIVE Tarantino fan when I was younger. I initially studied film at uni and made shorts in my spare time in no small part thanks to
Reservoir Dogs and Pulp Fiction.
Jackie Brown was good. Then came Kill Bill which I didn't really like. Kill Bill 2 was more of the same. So I tuned out and became a TV head through
first Sopranos then The Wire.
yawn, more small time posters trying to fuck with the man-god that is Ironjaw, holy shit son you are not the first and will definitely not be the last
FYI if you ever and I mean ever stepped to me with this weak retarded shit I would leave your stupid ass in traction and months later when you are
still recovering from an all encompassing beatdown you would hopefully have the mental stamina to think 'hey I should have never ever fucked with
Ironjaw from the internet' but most likely you would still be pissing yourself and seizing up and unable to complete that thought.
FYI if you ever and I mean ever stepped to me with this weak retarded shit I would leave your stupid ass in traction and months later when you are
still recovering from an all encompassing beatdown you would hopefully have the mental stamina to think 'hey I should have never ever fucked with
Ironjaw from the internet' but most likely you would still be pissing yourself and seizing up and unable to complete that thought.
One day I am going to find you & it is going to be fun.
Edit; offering $500.00 reward for Ionhaws street address U2U me.
When someone calls them self 'Ironjaw from the Internet',
Using some 'e-thug' retort as your comeback just doesn't really work.
So: Gary, the Mona Lisa. This is trash.
TRASH. How many tigers or skulls are in this painting?
THE ANSWER IS ZERO, WHICH IS THE garyEST NUMBER OF SKULLS OR TIGERS YOU CAN HAVE IN A PAINTING.
Dusk till Dawn was on repeat in the background for years and then yeh, QT dropped hard after being leeched by Rodriguez, who then used his experience
to fuck you all in the face with Machete.
And seriously MadFx, step back and look at the forum. Your following ionjaw like an underfed pup.
I never saw machete, I am a big QT fan rate him. Did you know about how he played stone
in his own favourite films event. My mate was the main role in that film & still has the same
bike to this day.
That looks crap. QT has become all about style over substance.
> MFW people think QT has ever been about substance
Sure, he's always written great dialogue. But he's not an indie guy anymore like he was for RD and PF, you're not going to get another Reservoir Dogs
(which essentially, is more of a play than a movie, plus if the rumours are true, he lifted much of that storyline from a chinese flick anyway, which
he'd never get away with these days).
I have no real hate of tarratino's films - he has made some excellent ones and some i prob will not watch again
Guy seems like a dickbag tho.
And def doesn't rate the hype he gets.
So: Gary, the Mona Lisa. This is trash.
TRASH. How many tigers or skulls are in this painting?
THE ANSWER IS ZERO, WHICH IS THE garyEST NUMBER OF SKULLS OR TIGERS YOU CAN HAVE IN A PAINTING.
So: Gary, the Mona Lisa. This is trash.
TRASH. How many tigers or skulls are in this painting?
THE ANSWER IS ZERO, WHICH IS THE garyEST NUMBER OF SKULLS OR TIGERS YOU CAN HAVE IN A PAINTING.
Right from the start of the first trailer, Tarantino lets us know how "Django Unchained" is going to handle slavery. While the auteur will obviously
bring his own irreverent spin to the subject, he is not shying away from showing the ugliest parts of slavery. Once freed, Django stylishly throws off
his worn-down blanket in ultra-cool slow-mo, but he reveals the scars and the reality of his captivity. The image perfectly captures how Tarantino
strikes the balance between truth and style in what's sure to be a controversial film.
[rquote=2456889& plus if the rumours are true, he lifted much of that storyline from a chinese flick anyway, which he'd never get away with these
days).
Ringo Lam's City On Fire
the plot is essentially a heist gone wrong, QT borrowed the whole look of the dudes in Reservoir Dogs (suits/shades - not really a wholly original
look to begin with) plus the 3 way standoff at the end.
edit: I still think Reservoir Dogs was a much better film, the Hong Kong one kind of sucked tbh
really? for me that's when Tarantino properly fell the fuck off
Kill Bill 1 was meh, 2 was boring as shit, but Death Proof imo was just retarded.
when Pulp Fiction came out I thought it was the greatest thing ever and saw it 3 times at the cinema...but then I was young and shit, and only later
realised that in fact people have been making films with a non-linear narrative since the 1950s
That looks crap. QT has become all about style over substance.
> MFW people think QT has ever been about substance
Sure, he's always written great dialogue. But he's not an indie guy anymore like he was for RD and PF, you're not going to get another Reservoir Dogs
(which essentially, is more of a play than a movie, plus if the rumours are true, he lifted much of that storyline from a chinese flick anyway, which
he'd never get away with these days).
I was suggesting that since Jackie Brown his movies have had less depth. I reckon that's pretty accurate aye.
![[*]](images/ozhiphop/default_icon.gif){kind=icon}
