OzHipHop.Com Forum
Gary
Not logged in [Login - Register]
Banner Banner
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
 Pages:  1    3  ..  8
Author: Subject: Cigarette plain packaging: ‘Anti-brand nanny state’ or ‘saving the children’
Eldy_H
custom status eligible
*****




Posts: 4245
Registered: 4-5-2005
Member Is Offline

Mood: <---> :booM

[*] posted on 20-8-2012 at 08:55 PM
Cigarette plain packaging: ‘Anti-brand nanny state’ or ‘saving the children’


Plain packaging is all go after a recent High Court decision

Two interesting articles have popped up on ABC’s ‘The Drum’ voicing two sides of the debate.

Adam Ferrier – pro plain packaging

vs

Brendan O’Neil – anti plain packaging

Do you feel strongly about any of the arguments put forward? Or have another hypothesis for the motives of such policy?
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Nerje
That's a fucking epic status bro, maybe something shorter
*****


Avatar


Posts: 9883
Registered: 3-1-2005
Location: on a bender
Member Is Offline

Mood: I a tuakky

[*] posted on 20-8-2012 at 09:02 PM


I give a shit neither way. I hope more of the youth adopt a no smoking attitude, but this won't help me quit, so I just can't bring myself to care




View user's profile View All Posts By User
tang_slayer
Oz Hip Hop Member
***


Avatar


Posts: 163
Registered: 15-7-2012
Location: Sydney
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 20-8-2012 at 09:14 PM


Just means I can smoke cheap cigarettes and no one will know I'm tight.



Bigger mistake than anakin skywalker
View user's profile View All Posts By User
honkylips
custom status eligible
*****


Avatar


Posts: 5682
Registered: 25-12-2005
Location: st kilda rd near nevs place
Member Is Offline

Mood: savvy

[*] posted on 20-8-2012 at 09:15 PM


I have not had a cigarette today, have not posted a thread about shaking and sweating. Not going to change a thing, except allow cigarette brands for pov cunts ( paul malls, choice etc) to increase market share as most people could not tell the difference between the run of the mill dart.



use rep code "193" on karmaloop for 20 % off purchase
View user's profile View All Posts By User
amatures
Chimay addict
*****




Posts: 5252
Registered: 7-7-2009
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 20-8-2012 at 09:19 PM


I'm pretty sure this idea was put forth by someone who doesn't smoke



Disclaimer: Views expressed by this account do not necessarily reflect those of the person typing them
View user's profile View All Posts By User
DrBind
Life! Death! Prizes!
*******

Avatar

Avatar


Posts: 28018
Registered: 11-3-2004
Location: Vagina shop
Member Is Offline

Mood: bull-like

[*] posted on 20-8-2012 at 09:37 PM


This shit is going to do fucking zero.

I don't smoke cigarettes. Have never smoked cigarettes and don't see the point of smoking a cigarette. I don't care if people want to smoke a cigarette, though.




Look at my drawings if you like: http://contextvillain.tumblr.com/

Available for gig reviews.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
LJ
[The O Exalted One]
*********




Posts: 5692
Registered: 2-6-2005
Location: Ozhiphop.com
Member Is Offline

Mood: Chirpy

[*] posted on 20-8-2012 at 09:40 PM


I disagree on many levels with the governments right to implement this on a legal level, however, I do think that, fuck it, smoking is a massive problem and let's see if it helps, as fuck all else works to stop people from starting. I smoke OPs so the packet doesn't matter to me.





Not JUST A Groupie. Meth Addict Too.
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
DrBind
Life! Death! Prizes!
*******

Avatar

Avatar


Posts: 28018
Registered: 11-3-2004
Location: Vagina shop
Member Is Offline

Mood: bull-like

[*] posted on 20-8-2012 at 09:44 PM


Quote: Originally posted by LJ  
I disagree on many levels with the governments right to implement this on a legal level, however, I do think that, fuck it, smoking is a massive problem and let's see if it helps, as fuck all else works to stop people from starting. I smoke OPs so the packet doesn't matter to me.



What makes you think the Government wants to do anything to curb this "massive problem"??




Look at my drawings if you like: http://contextvillain.tumblr.com/

Available for gig reviews.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
vapours
She Caught The.......
*****


Avatar


Posts: 4123
Registered: 16-11-2003
Location: Docklands
Member Is Offline

Mood: Food

[*] posted on 20-8-2012 at 09:55 PM


Quote: Originally posted by DrBind  
Quote: Originally posted by LJ  
I disagree on many levels with the governments right to implement this on a legal level, however, I do think that, fuck it, smoking is a massive problem and let's see if it helps, as fuck all else works to stop people from starting. I smoke OPs so the packet doesn't matter to me.



What makes you think the Government wants to do anything to curb this "massive problem"??


The extraordinary amount that smokers cost the public healthcare system is the main reason.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
amatures
Chimay addict
*****




Posts: 5252
Registered: 7-7-2009
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 20-8-2012 at 09:59 PM


Quote: Originally posted by DrBind  
Quote: Originally posted by LJ  
I disagree on many levels with the governments right to implement this on a legal level, however, I do think that, fuck it, smoking is a massive problem and let's see if it helps, as fuck all else works to stop people from starting. I smoke OPs so the packet doesn't matter to me.



What makes you think the Government wants to do anything to curb this "massive problem"??


Yep. The government doesn't want to do anything that will effect the amount of money they make. A cigarette is a cigarette to them. Whether it has gold blue or hot pink packaging. All they want to do is give the illusion that they are trying to stop people smoking. All these are just token gestures to appease those who are too stupid to understand this.




Disclaimer: Views expressed by this account do not necessarily reflect those of the person typing them
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Skematics
don\'t look at me funny blud
*****


Avatar


Posts: 3648
Registered: 24-8-2009
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 20-8-2012 at 10:00 PM


Quote: Originally posted by Eldy_H  
Plain packaging is all go after a recent High Court decision

Two interesting articles have popped up on ABC’s ‘The Drum’ voicing two sides of the debate.

Adam Ferrier – pro plain packaging

vs

Brendan O’Neil – anti plain packaging

Do you feel strongly about any of the arguments put forward? Or have another hypothesis for the motives of such policy?


brendan o'neil is an absolute fuck head who has missed the point entirely, i strongly advise steering clear of anything he writes, unless your like me and enjoy cringing. His argument is 'we're not zombie consumers'. who gives a fuck about the degree of persuasion, its still there and should in fact be limited. these ads are still in your fucking face without permission day in day out, any assault on that type of global business bullshit is a good move. people need to see this as a hinderance on big business, not consumers. Yes there are doing some shitty nanny state things going on, but to me this doesn't fall under that.

he's also overlooked the fact that it's primarily in respect of youthful first time smokers who are legitimately more impressionable and susceptible to these 'seductive branding campaigns'. all you need to do is see how cunts passively lap up shitty lady gaga nonsense to see that this bully-shove-it-down-your-fucking-throat-everyday nonsense is in fact effective and detrimental to human progression. saturation techniques are fucking real. and they do have an affect. likadikaday.

TL;DR

people who whinge about the government in this country really don't have much perspective, especially in comparison to some other governments out there.




http://www.DFTC.com.au

http://www.soundcloud.com/skematic
View user's profile Visit user's homepage View All Posts By User
vapours
She Caught The.......
*****


Avatar


Posts: 4123
Registered: 16-11-2003
Location: Docklands
Member Is Offline

Mood: Food

[*] posted on 20-8-2012 at 10:11 PM


Quote: Originally posted by amatures  
Quote: Originally posted by DrBind  
Quote: Originally posted by LJ  
I disagree on many levels with the governments right to implement this on a legal level, however, I do think that, fuck it, smoking is a massive problem and let's see if it helps, as fuck all else works to stop people from starting. I smoke OPs so the packet doesn't matter to me.



What makes you think the Government wants to do anything to curb this "massive problem"??


Yep. The government doesn't want to do anything that will effect the amount of money they make. A cigarette is a cigarette to them. Whether it has gold blue or hot pink packaging. All they want to do is give the illusion that they are trying to stop people smoking. All these are just token gestures to appease those who are too stupid to understand this.


Doesn't make sense. Victorian smoking rates have halved in the last 20 years or so through banning of advertising, public smoking and anti-smoking campaigns.

Smokers also die earlier, robbing the Government of income tax, and money that isn't spent on cigarettes by smokers are spent on other items which earn the Government money through GST/taxes.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
amatures
Chimay addict
*****




Posts: 5252
Registered: 7-7-2009
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 20-8-2012 at 10:16 PM


Considering it is pretty evident the health effects smoking has, why don't they just ban it then?



Disclaimer: Views expressed by this account do not necessarily reflect those of the person typing them
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Verbalize
Oz Hip Hop Member
***




Posts: 531
Registered: 7-1-2011
Location: Perth
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 20-8-2012 at 10:23 PM


Quote: Originally posted by amatures  
Considering it is pretty evident the health effects smoking has, why don't they just ban it then?


Because it's a multi-million dollar industry. They don't give a shit about you.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
vapours
She Caught The.......
*****


Avatar


Posts: 4123
Registered: 16-11-2003
Location: Docklands
Member Is Offline

Mood: Food

[*] posted on 20-8-2012 at 10:23 PM


Quote: Originally posted by amatures  
Considering it is pretty evident the health effects smoking has, why don't they just ban it then?


Can you imagine the effects of banning a product that 15% of the population are addicted to?

The main goal will be reaching a managable amount (say 1%) and putting those people into programs and forcing them off.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
amatures
Chimay addict
*****




Posts: 5252
Registered: 7-7-2009
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 20-8-2012 at 10:31 PM


Quote: Originally posted by vapours  
Quote: Originally posted by amatures  
Considering it is pretty evident the health effects smoking has, why don't they just ban it then?


Can you imagine the effects of banning a product that 15% of the population are addicted to?

The main goal will be reaching a managable amount (say 1%) and putting those people into programs and forcing them off.


I think this is a bit optimistic. I honestly don't think the government has any intentions to stop people smoking. They will keep people addicted as long as,they can while making these token gestures. The amount of revenue they make from smoking dwarfs any amount that it costs the health system.




Disclaimer: Views expressed by this account do not necessarily reflect those of the person typing them
View user's profile View All Posts By User
one-inch-punch
f+2~1
*****


Avatar


Posts: 22248
Registered: 23-3-2003
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 20-8-2012 at 10:35 PM


Any actual smoker doesn't give a flying fuck about what colour packet their cigarettes come in. I do think it is slightly less persuasive to on-the-fence type smokers, teenagers etc. Maybe.

I'm not a big fan of the government trying to tell people how to live and I don't want to live in Pleasantville. I also don't think "they" are just making token gestures, I think it's more a case of one lobby fighting against another as per usual.


That Brendan O'Neil article was an actual piece of human excrement.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Hollo
custom status eligible
*****


Avatar


Posts: 1486
Registered: 25-7-2012
Location: Melbyzz
Member Is Offline

Mood: Turn around, keep walking. Get off the block.

[*] posted on 20-8-2012 at 10:36 PM


I don't give a shit what the Packet looks like all it's going to do is make it hard for them to tell what's what when I buy it. If it stops the kiddies from buying Winnie optimum nights then good. It pisses me off the person who's pushing the idea is doing it cause her uncle died from smoking. It's his life choice and im sure he would of wanted her to accept that besides this world is becoming more overpopulated day by day and smoking is thinning out the numbers.

[Edited on 20-8-2012 by Hollo]
View user's profile View All Posts By User
vapours
She Caught The.......
*****


Avatar


Posts: 4123
Registered: 16-11-2003
Location: Docklands
Member Is Offline

Mood: Food

[*] posted on 20-8-2012 at 10:46 PM


Quote: Originally posted by amatures  
The amount of revenue they make from smoking dwarfs any amount that it costs the health system.


It was a Phillip Morris study that came up with that, as well as somebody looking at the difference in cigarette income tax VS healthcare costs without taking into account the missing income tax while somebody is dead. As well as the fact that the person who isn't spending their money on cigarettes, its spending money on other items which makes the Government money in other ways (we're just going around in circles now)

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14982702?dopt=Citation

FYI: The target is to drop smoking rates to 9% by 2020.

[Edited on 20-8-2012 by vapours]
View user's profile View All Posts By User
ultimate_hater
custom status eligible
*****


Avatar


Posts: 9986
Registered: 12-12-2004
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 20-8-2012 at 11:18 PM


Quote:

Two interesting articles have popped up on ABC’s ‘The Drum’


Sceptical. Show is waaaaack.


Quote:

voicing two sides of the debate.

Adam Ferrier – pro plain packaging

vs

Brendan O’Neil – anti plain packaging

Do you feel strongly about any of the arguments put forward? Or have another hypothesis for the motives of such policy?



tldr.

Good, as long as you can still obtain them freely.





[Edited on 20-8-2012 by ultimate_hater]

[Edited on 20-8-2012 by ultimate_hater]
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Eldy_H
custom status eligible
*****




Posts: 4245
Registered: 4-5-2005
Member Is Offline

Mood: <---> :booM

[*] posted on 20-8-2012 at 11:35 PM


^The website was around well before the TV show arrived simply to fill time on a dedicated news channel.

Agree re: Brendan O’Neil and excrement being in alignment

And agree re: vapours’ arguments

For those saying the change will do little, did you check the YouTube clip from Adam’s article? It does really clutch at the emotional to sell its point, but in doing so comes from only one angle which I honestly didn't think of when I first heard about plain packaging.




View user's profile View All Posts By User
gps
PureBred
*****


Avatar


Posts: 1589
Registered: 17-10-2002
Location: 33:52:22S, 151:06:17E
Member Is Offline

Mood: Shut up & Deal

[*] posted on 20-8-2012 at 11:44 PM


Seen those Japanese guys kicking the origami out of cigarette packs?

Bose.




www.purebredpoker.com.au

Go to: www.pbp.co
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Toam.of.Toam.Ho
u2u me
*****


Avatar


Posts: 6197
Registered: 25-6-2007
Location: Space Physics Lab
Member Is Offline

Mood: Relativistic quantum physicist

[*] posted on 20-8-2012 at 11:57 PM


Quote: Originally posted by DrBind  
This shit is going to do fucking zero.

I don't smoke cigarettes. Have never smoked cigarettes and don't see the point of smoking a cigarette. I don't care if people want to smoke a cigarette, though.



I used to work at a place that sold cigarettes. We used to have a display. Dudes would be like "what cigarettes do you have?". I could just point to the display. This was good because, chances were, we did not have the obscure brand they wanted and they were free to choose from the two brands we stocked. I would then supply them with whichever one they asked for.

Then the "don't display that shit" rule came in. Suddenly I have to explain to them which fucking brands we have, which "strengths" or whatever we have and end up in a fucking 10 minute conversation about which one would be the closest approximation to whatever the fuck it is that they usually smoked.

Pretty much any regulation to the sale of tobacco does nothing but annoy people who have to sell it.


edit: upon reflection, I'm not sure why I quoted Bind to say this.

[Edited on 20-8-2012 by Toam.of.Toam.Ho]




Position has been filled.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
Mackula
custom status eligible
*****


Avatar


Posts: 4580
Registered: 24-2-2009
Location: beer volcano/stripper factory
Member Is Offline

Mood: 9-tre

[*] posted on 21-8-2012 at 12:13 AM


there are bigger health issues out there...



D O T H E M A T H
View user's profile View All Posts By User
DrBind
Life! Death! Prizes!
*******

Avatar

Avatar


Posts: 28018
Registered: 11-3-2004
Location: Vagina shop
Member Is Offline

Mood: bull-like

[*] posted on 21-8-2012 at 12:46 AM


Quote: Originally posted by Toam.of.Toam.Ho  
Quote: Originally posted by DrBind  
This shit is going to do fucking zero.

I don't smoke cigarettes. Have never smoked cigarettes and don't see the point of smoking a cigarette. I don't care if people want to smoke a cigarette, though.



I used to work at a place that sold cigarettes. We used to have a display. Dudes would be like "what cigarettes do you have?". I could just point to the display. This was good because, chances were, we did not have the obscure brand they wanted and they were free to choose from the two brands we stocked. I would then supply them with whichever one they asked for.

Then the "don't display that shit" rule came in. Suddenly I have to explain to them which fucking brands we have, which "strengths" or whatever we have and end up in a fucking 10 minute conversation about which one would be the closest approximation to whatever the fuck it is that they usually smoked.

Pretty much any regulation to the sale of tobacco does nothing but annoy people who have to sell it.


edit: upon reflection, I'm not sure why I quoted Bind to say this.

[Edited on 20-8-2012 by Toam.of.Toam.Ho]


I think you may have quoted me because when I worked at the post office I would bring up this gripe quite often and I'm p sure I've posted about it on here.

But yeah, I used to just open the doors so cunts could see what we had rather than me have to remember names.

Whenever people asked about milligrams and shit I would just say "I don't know. I don't smoke." Then they'd usually look at me like "Why don't you know? Are you a retard?" then I'd look at them like "Why don't you know? Are you a retard?"




Look at my drawings if you like: http://contextvillain.tumblr.com/

Available for gig reviews.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
 Pages:  1    3  ..  8

  Go To Top

Powered by XMB 1.9.11 (Debug Mode)
XMB Forum Software © 2001-2012 The XMB Group